The third theme is a gingerly advanced proposition about local government in general, though the focus is land-use regulation. I will suggest that zoning’s historical development— evolution may be too fraught a term—should be regarded as being comparable to that of the common law and thus be taken more seriously by scholars than it normally is. My specific example is the development of zoning in Los Angeles that led to the puzzling court decision, Hadacheck v. Los Angeles, 239 U.S. 394 (1915), which permitted the city to expel a previously established brickyard from a subsequently-developed residential area without compensation. The fulcrum issue is why most zoning allows nonconforming uses to continue despite that decision. To add to Dick Babcock’s oral dictum that “nobody loves zoning but the people” I would add “and nobody but the people can change zoning.”
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
September 21, 2010