Sequential Innovation, Patents, and Imitation

Sequential Innovation, Patents, and Imitation

We argue that when innovation is “sequential” (so that each successive invention builds in an essential way on its predecessors) and “complementary” (so that each potential innovator takes a different research line), patent protection is not as useful for encouraging innovation as in a static setting. Indeed, society and even inventors themselves may be better off without such protection. Furthermore, an inventor’s prospective profit may actually be enhanced by competition and imitation. Our sequential model of innovation appears to explain evidence from a natural experiment in the software industry.

James Bessen and Eric Maskin

RAND Journal of Economics


I didn't find this helpful.This was helpful. Please let us know if you found this article helpful.
By |2019-09-05T06:36:42-07:00January 1st, 2018|Intellectual Property, Patents, Political Economy, Reference|