Patent and copyright laws create temporary monopolies, known as “intellectual property,” designed to incentivize artistic creation and technological innovation. While these monopolies raise returns for patent and copyright holders, they also impose costs—not only on consumers forced to pay higher prices, but also on downstream innovators dependent on monopolized inputs. These costs have exploded in recent decades because of a huge and unwarranted expansion in the scope of patent and copyright protection. As a consequence, intellectual property law now does more to deter innovation than to encourage it—while at the same time generating huge fortunes and outsized profits for a lucky few.
Blog posts about Intellectual Property
This Week in Intellectual Property, October 22nd
News and Commentary In the Huffington Post, Daniel Maranas writes about the European Union's alternative "waiver" text in its negotiations over the TRIPS [...]
This Week in Intellectual Property, October 13th
News and Commentary The Niskanen Center has proudly joined a letter with a group of copyright reformers encouraging the Biden Administration to ensure [...]
This Week in Intellectual Property, October 8th
News and Commentary Writing for the Niskanen Center's main website, I discuss why the month of September has been so fantastic for drug [...]
This Week in Intellectual Property, October 1st
News and Commentary In TechDirt, Mike Masnick criticizes an op-ed by Michael Rosen in The Hill. Rosen maintains that the proposed TRIPS waiver [...]
See more Intellectual Property blog posts »