Increasingly restrictive land-use regulations are driving up housing prices in many of America’s biggest, most productive cities. In Manhattan, San Francisco, and San Jose, for example, this “regulatory tax” accounts for an estimated 50 percent of housing prices. In addition to exacerbating problems of housing affordability at the local level, these regulations are undermining economic growth at the national level via a growing misallocation of the work force. Specifically, U.S. GDP is lower than it could be because people are being priced out of moving to those metro areas that disproportionately produce GDP. In addition, income inequality across metro areas and regions of the country is higher than it would be if people were free to move to where jobs and opportunities are most plentiful.
Blog posts about Land Use Regulation
This Week in Land Use Regulation, October 22nd
News and Commentary At the Diamondback, Shreya Vuttaluru covers ongoing zoning revisions in Prince George's county: it "shouldn’t significantly alter housing and development [...]
This Week in Land Use Regulation, October 15th
News and Commentary At AEI, Edward Pinto and Tobias Peter present the latest trends in home purchases. "In Sep. 2021, while increases in [...]
This Week in Land Use Regulation, October 8th
News and Commentary In a paper in the American Economic Review, Enrico Moretti evaluates whether high-tech clusters, highly concentrated in relatively few cities, [...]
This Week in Land Use Regulation, October 1st
News and Commentary At Reason, Sasha Volokh explores in detail the constitutionality of universities' influence on zoning. In Spur, Michael Lane heralds the [...]
See more Land Use Regulation blog posts »